Exit & Separation Protocol

Download this template

Generated 2026-04-29 · Download all templates

  • Layer: 1 — Membership System
  • Status: Template — adapt for your community
  • RCOS reference: §3.6, §3.7, §3.8

Voluntary Exit

RCOS clauses: 3.6.1, 3.6.2, 3.6.4

Why make leaving frictionless?

A community that is hard to leave is not a community — it is a trap. Voluntary exit must be available at all times, without interrogation, notice periods, or punishment, because the right to withdraw consent is what makes every other act of consent real. Retaining contribution history separately ensures that leaving does not erase the work the person did.

How to fill this in

Describe the channel for submitting exit, time-to-revocation of access, what records are retained, and the resulting state transition.

Forced Exit

RCOS clauses: 3.6.3, 3.6.4

Why gate removal behind Layer 4?

Removal is the sharpest power the community holds over a person. If it can be exercised by anyone with enough social pull, membership is worthless. Requiring a concluded Layer 4 accountability decision — with written reasons, a notification, and a minimum re-application window — turns removal from an act of power into an act of governance that can be reviewed and contested.

How to fill this in

State that forced exit can only follow a concluded Layer 4 accountability process. Define notification, access revocation, retained records, re-application block, and decision-record privacy.

Suspension

RCOS clauses: 3.7.1, 3.7.2, 3.7.3

Why design suspension carefully or not at all?

A poorly-designed suspension state is worse than none — it becomes a soft exit with no due process, or an indefinite limbo used to punish without the accountability of a full removal. If the community cannot commit to explicit conditions, time bounds, and review mechanisms, it is safer to have no formal suspension than a loose one.

How to fill this in

Either define suspension explicitly (entry conditions, time limits, rights during suspension, review mechanism, exit) or state that no formal suspension exists. Do not leave this section ambiguous.

Asset, Role, and Responsibility Separation

RCOS clauses: 3.6.5

Why enumerate separation steps?

When someone leaves, every unclosed thread — a role nobody vacated, a wallet key still active, a task still assigned — becomes a live attack surface or an operational gap. A checklist forces these threads to be closed deliberately, not discovered months later when something breaks or someone abuses access they no longer should have.

How to fill this in

Provide a checklist applied to both voluntary and forced exits. Include role vacation, task release, financial-instrument access removal, platform admin revocation, and resolution of outstanding obligations.

The following separation steps apply to both voluntary and forced exits:


Ratification Record

  • Adopted:
  • Decision type: Strategic
  • Version:
  • Decision record:

RCOS Blueprint by EcoHubs

A modular operating system that defines how intentional communities organize — from governance and roles to resource sharing and conflict resolution — in support of resilience, fairness, and regeneration.

Connect

© 2026 EcoHubs Platform. All rights reserved.